SoapZone Community: Politics Message Board

Subject:

Romney's bipartisonship in MA -- Obama’s one-party strident approach????

From: kll Find all posts by kll Send private message to kll
Date: Thu, 08-Nov-2012 2:05:38 PM PST
Where: SoapZone Community: Politics Message Board
In reply to: Dick Morris: Why I was wrong posted by LM
What is the guy smoking! While Romney touted his record in Massachusetts, there is a reason HE LOST THE STATE BY ABOUT 25 POINTS!!!!! He talks about how great Massachusetts stacks up in terms of education - but education leaders said he was disasterous towards public education in their state!

As for Obama's one-party strident approach -- from what I saw Obama extended his hand across the aisle -- and instead of shaking it the Republicans did their best to cut it off! They made it clear that their first priority was to make sure he was a one term president. They would rather Obama fail, than have a successful program that might end up being popular.

I still don't see one thing Obama has done that could be labeled socialist -- yet they make it sound like it is a fact. And they can complain about what Obama has done with the economy all they want, there is no evidence it would be any better if McCain had won -- and while Romney promised jobs, his only strategy was to lower taxes, which Bush proved doesn't work.

As for the demographics - I voted for Obama, and I'm a white, single female, 55-60. And I'm not sitting around waiting for my "free stuff."

Karen L.


1 reply, 3 views
generated page in 0.031 seconds using 10 database requests (reply links generated fresh)
Message archived, no new replies.
back to topic list